OA CodeMHPAEA Parity Applies

Appealing a UnitedHealthcare / Optum OA-23 Denial

A UnitedHealthcare / Optum OA-23 denial (prior authorization required / other payer) is one of the most common claim rejections behavioral health therapists face. This guide explains exactly what caused the denial and the most effective appeal strategy for behavioral health practices.

What this denial means

The payer is saying this service either required prior authorization that another payer should have provided, or that the prior authorization from another payer is needed before they will adjudicate. In behavioral health, OA-23 is commonly used to deny ongoing therapy when authorization from a primary insurer was not obtained first.

MHPAEA Mental Health Parity Argument

When OA-23 is used to require prior authorization for mental health therapy without a comparable requirement for medical/surgical outpatient services, it constitutes an NQTL under MHPAEA — the payer must demonstrate the authorization standard is applied equally to both benefit classifications. CAA 2021 § 203 entitles you to the written NQTL comparative analysis on request; that disclosure duty applies regardless of the 2025 federal non-enforcement of the 2024 Final Rule.

Request UnitedHealthcare / Optum's written Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitation (NQTL) comparative analysis. They are required to provide it under the MHPAEA Enforcement Final Rule (2024).

Your appeal strategy

Clarify with the payer exactly which authorization is missing — is it their own, or another payer's? If it is a coordination-of-benefits issue, submit the primary EOB. If the payer is requiring a prior authorization that they themselves should have issued, invoke MHPAEA: compare the authorization requirement to what is required for comparable medical/surgical services. Request the payer's NQTL analysis documenting why mental health therapy requires authorization while comparable outpatient medical services do not.

What UnitedHealthcare / Optum requires

Appeal Address
UnitedHealthcare Appeals
P.O. Box 30432
Salt Lake City, UT 84130
Response Window

30 calendar days (Level-1 appeal)

External Review Deadline

60 days from Level-1 denial

Fax

1-801-938-2100

Provider Portal
File online
UnitedHealthcare / Optum Parity Notes

UHC/Optum manages behavioral health in-house for most commercial products. UHC was subject to a landmark MHPAEA lawsuit (Wit v. United Behavioral Health, 2021 remanded 2022). Document medical necessity criteria carefully; UHC has been found to use overly restrictive internal coverage criteria.

Generate your UnitedHealthcare / Optum OA-23 appeal letter

First 5 letters free. No credit card. Editable draft in about 60 seconds.

Generate my appeal letter →

Frequently asked questions

How long does UnitedHealthcare / Optum have to respond to a OA-23 appeal?

Under federal regulations and most state prompt-payment laws, UnitedHealthcare / Optum must respond to a Level-1 internal appeal within 30 calendar days. If you receive an adverse determination, you typically have 60 calendar days from the date of the Level-1 denial to request external review. Send the appeal via certified mail or through the payer's portal and keep documentation of the submission date.

Does MHPAEA apply to OA-23 denials?

Yes. When OA-23 is used to require prior authorization for mental health therapy without a comparable requirement for medical/surgical outpatient services, it constitutes an NQTL under MHPAEA — the payer must demonstrate the authorization standard is applied equally to both benefit classifications. CAA 2021 § 203 entitles you to the written NQTL comparative analysis on request; that disclosure duty applies regardless of the 2025 federal non-enforcement of the 2024 Final Rule. When filing a OA-23 appeal against UnitedHealthcare / Optum, request their written comparative analysis for mental health vs. medical/surgical benefits under 29 CFR § 2590.712. UHC/Optum manages behavioral health in-house for most commercial products. UHC was subject to a landmark MHPAEA lawsuit (Wit v. United Behavioral Health, 2021 remanded 2022). Document medical necessity criteria carefully; UHC has been found to use overly restrictive internal coverage criteria.

Can I appeal a OA-23 denial more than once?

Yes. Most payers, including UnitedHealthcare / Optum, allow at least two levels of internal appeal (Level-1 and Level-2 or "expedited" review). After exhausting internal appeals, you have the right to request an Independent Medical Review (IMR) or external review through your state insurance commissioner. Keep copies of every appeal, submission confirmation, and payer response.

What documentation do I need to appeal a OA-23 denial from UnitedHealthcare / Optum?

At minimum: the original Explanation of Benefits (EOB) or Remittance Advice (RA) showing the OA-23 denial, the original claim details (CPT code, date of service, NPI, charge amount), and any clinical documentation supporting medical necessity. Because this code has parity implications, also include a written request for UnitedHealthcare / Optum's NQTL comparative analysis under MHPAEA. Submit everything in one packet with a cover letter citing the specific denial code, the date of service, and the claim number.